| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2360
   |
Posted - 2015.02.16 19:27:08 -
[1] - Quote
SnowFlower Crendraven wrote:thanks for all the responses, I like to here from other players on this. I really don't know all the game mechanic's and now that i see its rigged to pamper the players that can't seem to find others to fight fair I've decided to quit mining . CHEERS
With such an obvious troll OP, you should have waited before posting this. Going to have to adjust your score accordingly from 3/10 to 0/10. Must try harder.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2363
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 08:59:40 -
[2] - Quote
Market McSelling Alt wrote:Prove that gankers actually go to low or null. You can't, and I can't prove they don't.
Look at my killboard. You'll see highsec suicide ganks, lowsec piracy and a stupid orca loss there, another stupid orca loss in a wormhole (but any dead orca is a good orca, so it's OK) and you'll see some nullsec stuff, too. So, yes, you absolutely can prove that gankers go to other parts of space.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2364
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 09:11:57 -
[3] - Quote
Mistah Ewedynao wrote:1. It is silly for -10's to be able to dock in High sec stations...or even -5's.
The people who decide your sec status are nothing to do with the powerful mega corporations who own the stations. Said corporations want your business and really don't give a damn about what you get up to in space, providing you're not doing it to them.
Mistah Ewedynao wrote:2. It is total BS to think/claim that ganking random EMPTY or very low value cargo carrying freighters has a potential for profit, it's griefing.
In addition to the excellent points raised by Cancel Align NOW, not everyone can be bothered to scan before they shoot. Zkillboard offers plenty of evidence as to why it's perfectly reasonable to blow up a ship just in case it has a decent loot table.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2370
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 20:57:26 -
[4] - Quote
Lefty Lulu wrote:Through all the pumping out of chests and tiresome smack talk, it all boils down to this. It's about cowards getting cheap kills the only way cowards know, by seeking out the peaceful.
Gimme your stuff, WoW is that way --->.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy
2385
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 11:16:06 -
[5] - Quote
Demerius Xenocratus wrote:I'm not a huge fan of the highsec grief crowd.
If this mythical "grief crowd" actually existed, surely you'd petition them to CCP? If they weren't mythical before you reported them, they sure would be afterwards.
Sharise Dragonstar wrote:They have no interest in the isk value of what they destroy. There joy comes from upsetting others.
You would / do get upset when you're ganked, therefore all gankers gank in order to upset people? Isn't this called projection?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff | No-one hates you, none of us care enough for that.
Sabriz for CSM
|
| |
|